Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-597356

Opposes rescissionPosted October 6, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “I camp, hike, bike, hunt, and fish”
    • “Wild, roadless places enhance these outdoor activities”
    • “My tourist dollars help sustain small communities”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “protect the drinking water supply”
    • “worse sediment impact to waterways”
    • “negatively impact... water quality”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “forest fragmentation”
    • “Wild, roadless places”
    • “keep the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule in place”

What it names

National Forests
Monongahela National Forest

The comment

I support Alternative 1 to keep the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule in place. I camp, hike, bike, hunt, and fish in the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests across Virginia and in the Monongahela National Forest of West Virginia. Wild, roadless places enhance these outdoor activities and are why I frequently visit these national forests. My tourist dollars help sustain small communities surrounded by these forests. The limited roads and development in these forests also help protect the drinking water supply for these same communities and other communities downstream. The U.S. Forest Service already can’t maintain the roads it has. Building more will only lead to worse sediment impact to waterways and forest fragmentation, both of which negatively impact outdoor recreation and water quality.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless