Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-599770

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “Areas protected by this rule should not be sacrificed and destroyed”
    • “We need nature and nature deserves protections”
    • “not to be endlessly extracted from”

The comment

I am dishearted by our government attempting to rescind the roadless rule. Areas protected by this rule should not be sacrificed and destroyed. We need nature and nature deserves protections, not to be endlessly extracted from!

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless