Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-599774

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Exact copy — Byte-identical to another submission. This comment stands for 2 submissions in its group.

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

Recreation Tourism Public Use
- “regularly use public lands in Oregon and throughout the West for hiking, camping, climbing, and recreation”
- “put public lands in danger for current and future generations”
Water Quality Quantity
- “fresh water”
- “put public lands in danger for current and future generations' fresh water”
Forest Management Wildfire
- “increase risk of forest fires”
- “introduce development without appropriate planning or regulation”

The comment

I oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. I live in Washington State and regularly use public lands in Oregon and throughout the West for hiking, camping, climbing, and recreation. The repeal of the Roadless Rule will put public lands in danger for current and future generations' fresh water, will increase risk of forest fires, and introduce development without appropriate planning or regulation. For the reasons listed above, fully or partially rescinding the Roadless Rule under Alternatives 2 and 3 of the draft EIS would be a grave mistake. I oppose the proposal to rescind or alter the Roadless Rule and support Alternative 1, the No Action alternative. thank you.