“essential areas relied upon by communities, Tribal Nations”
“Indigenous stewardship”
The comment
Submit your public comment opposing the repeal of the Roadless Rule. Here's a comment you can use:
I am firmly against USDA’s proposal to rescind the 2001 Roadless Rule.
Roadless national forests represent some of the last unspoiled public forest landscapes. They safeguard clean drinking water, wildlife habitats, salmon streams, old growth forests, outdoor recreation, and essential areas relied upon by communities, Tribal Nations, and future generations. Once these lands are disrupted by new roads, logging, and industrial access, the damage cannot be easily reversed.
The USDA should not dismantle a national protection that has shielded roadless forests for over twenty years. The current Roadless Rule already enables necessary measures to mitigate wildfire risk, so rescinding it is unnecessary for community safety. In reality, more roads may increase human ignition risk, habitat fragmentation, erosion, and long-term management costs.
Additionally, rescinding the rule could transfer protection decisions to local planning processes, making intact forests more susceptible to political pressure and short-sighted extraction. Public forests should be managed for clean water, biodiversity, climate resilience, Indigenous stewardship, and public good, not for increased roadbuilding and logging.
Please withdraw the proposed repeal, retain the 2001 Roadless Rule, and select the strongest alternative to protect roadless areas throughout the National Forest System.
Thank you for taking my comment into account.