Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-599831

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “protecting our areas”
    • “destroy our forested area”
    • “protecting our forests”
    • “beneficial to everyone”
  • Economic Impact Fiscal
    • “companies who are out for profit”
    • “monitary benefits just to satify the stockholders”
    • “Keep industry, corportations and individuals from using up our lands”
  • Public Land Access Rights
    • “The land belongs to the people”
    • “using up our lands”

The comment

With respect to the Special Areas Roadless Area Conservation, do not pass this bill. There is a reason that we had to pass a bill protecting our areas before. WHY would we want to reverse and let companies who are out for profit destroy our forested area. The land belongs to the people! Keep industry, corportations and individuals from using up our lands. If we can not learn from the past we will be doomed to repeat it. The benefit from protecting our forests out weighs ANY monitary benefits just to satify the stockholders. Our country lost our forests before and after protecting the land it is now beautiful and benefitial to everyone

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless