Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-599873

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “monitoring rare plants”
    • “loss of species and their habitats”
    • “negatively affected by opening large swaths of land”
    • “devastating impacts on their already fragmented and struggling populations”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “health of high elevation streams and wet meadows”
    • “wetland functioning”
    • “least accessible, most protected populations were by far the healthiest”
    • “stunted individual plants that were unable to flower”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “altered hydrology”
    • “health of high elevation streams”
    • “wetland functioning”

What it names

Roadless areas
Latir Peak

The comment

I am a restoration ecologist with direct experience monitoring rare plants, including on Forest Service land that is currently protected by the 2001 Roadless Rule. I wholeheartedly oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The Arizona willow, Salix arizonica, is a rare willow species that acts as an indicator species for the health of high elevation streams and wet meadows in the Four Corners states. The willow is listed as critically imperiled in New Mexico, where I was able to visit populations across its range to evaluate population health and wetland functioning. The results of those surveys were stark: the least accessible, most protected populations were by far the healthiest, with lower incidences of grazing and disease, taller individuals, and more reproductive individuals present. Populations in one of the inventoried roadless areas adjacent to the Latir Peak Wilderness are already at a tipping point, with stunted individual plants that were unable to flower due to cattle grazing in the area. Potentially subjecting this species to additional stressors from development and altered hydrology will have devastating impacts on their already fragmented and struggling populations. This example is just one in thousands of species, including over 400 that are protected under the Endangered Species Act, that will be negatively affected by opening large swaths of land to new road building and extractive industry uses. The purported benefits in no way outweigh the potential costs of loss of species and their habitats.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless