Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-599878

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Governance Policy Process
    • “if changes should be needed those need to be made at the local level”
    • “recinding in its entirety leaves too much open to the unknown”
    • “This rule should stand in its existing form”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “balance between multiple use access and conservation”
    • “This rule should stand in its existing form”

The comment

Having lived in the mountains and the west most of my life I understand that balance between multiple use access and conservation. This rule should stand in its existing form and if changes should be needed those need to be made at the local level, recinding in its entirety leaves too much open to the unknown.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless