Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-599907

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

The comment

Under Secretary Boren Chief Schultz Secretary Rollins I am writing to ask you to support the “No Action Alternative” regarding eliminating the Roadless Rule Recission. After retiring from working for the USFS for 30 years I would love to go into the reasons why I am asking this but this Administration is short on Science/facts & long on stupid so I feel I’s be wasting my time; besides, I believe the die has been cast & the decision already made. However, I want my name to go on the record as opposing eliminating the Roadless Rule. FYI – I am a member of the Backcountry Hunters & Anglers, the National Association of Forest Service Retirees & the National Parks Conservation Association.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless