Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-600005

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “conservation benefits to fauna who need tracts of land undisturbed by humans”
    • “intact ecosystems support the nature capital that we all depend upon”
    • “ensure we continue to have roadless areas in our public lands”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “Getting rid of the legislation that protect roadless areas is a miserable, stupid idea”
    • “Please do not go ahead with such legislation”

The comment

Large, intact ecosystems, such at the roadless areas, offer numerous benefits. Obviously, there are conservation benefits to fauna who need tracts of land undisturbed by humans. From an anthropomorphic point of view, intact ecosystems support the nature capital that we all depend upon. In other words, without nature, we all perish. That alone should be sufficient reason to ensure we continue to have roadless areas in our public lands. Getting rid of the legislation that protect roadless areas is a miserable, stupid idea. Please do not go ahead with such legislation. Thank you. CYoung

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless