Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-600199

Supports rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “wildfire suppression efforts”
    • “Fires that start in roadless areas are statistically five times larger”
    • “management of landscapes”
  • Economic Impact Fiscal
    • “economically for the entire logging and lumber industries”
    • “effected industries”

The comment

It is not only in the best interest for wildfire suppression efforts but also economically for the entire logging and lumber industries to Recind the roadless rule. Almost the entirety of the opponents of rescinding the roadless rule have opinions based on wildly false information such as fires starting near roads which the data includes major interstate highways, city and urban areas and is not exclusive to USFS or BLM road systems. Fires that start in roadless areas are statistically five times larger than those within accessible roaded systems, and these fires account for 59% of all acres burned annually. Many of the opponents have limited to zero experience in the management of landscapes nor are even part of the effected industries.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless