Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-600208

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “Road construction fragments critical migration corridors”
    • “destroys habitats”
    • “preserves bordering ecosystems that support many threatened or endangered species”
  • Climate Carbon Storage
    • “old-growth trees that serve as massive carbon sinks”
    • “combat climate change”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “healthy fisheries”

The comment

Hello I am a high school senior and I want to comment in favor of keeping the Roadless Rule. I would it it to be kept because Road construction fragments critical migration corridors and destroys habitats. The rule preserves bordering ecosystems that support many threatened or endangered species, healthy fisheries, and old-growth trees that serve as massive carbon sinks to combat climate change getting rid of the rule would change the ecosystems for the worse and would greatly affect humans as well we don't need more roads we need to preserve the ecosystems so that is doesn't collapse and cause huge problems for future generations to come. thank you for considering my comment.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless