Roadless
.
org
Hundreds of wild places.
Millions of wild acres.
One rule
protects them all.
Now: tell Congress to make the Roadless Rule law.
Comment Period Closed
99%+
oppose
Comment Analysis →
Explore Roadless Areas
Home
Self-Guided
Learning
DEIS in
Plain English
Contact
Congress
Comment
Analysis
Read the
Comments
Bibliography
Stay
Involved
Back to Home
Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001
FS-2025-0001-600223
Overview
In numbers
Substance
Topics
Places
Law & science
Campaigns
The full count
Look up a comment
Read the comments
Opposes rescission
Posted October 7, 2026
On Regulations.gov
Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.
Topics
Environmental Protection Biodiversity
“destroy large areas of wilderness”
“strip further resources”
“unnecessary... to rescind these rules”
Economic Impact Fiscal
“add profit to already bloated corporations”
“not in our nation's interest”
The comment
It is unnecessary and not in our nation’s interest to rescind these rules. This would only serve to add profit to already bloated corporations. There is no need to strip further resources and destroy large areas of wilderness.