Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-600399

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “attraction for national and global tourism”
    • “beautiful scenery”
    • “destroy this area of tourism”
    • “beauty to be preserved and protected”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “homes of wildlife”
    • “minimally disturbed by construction”
    • “rare occurrence in a nation that's constantly evolving”
  • Cultural Heritage Indigenous
    • “disrupt hundreds of years of history”
    • “preserved in our national parks”

The comment

Rescinding the roadless area rule would be a great disservice to our country. Our National Parks are some of the most beautiful land in our nations. It contains land that has been minimally disturbed by construction, litter, roadways, etc, which is a rare occurrence in a nation that’s constantly evolving and growing. Our national parks are an attraction for national and global tourism, attracting people from throughout the world to see the beautiful scenery. Adding roadways or other construction would not only destroy this area of tourism and the homes of wildlife, it would disrupt hundreds of years of history preserved in our national parks. The people of the United States do not want roads to be added to our national parks, we want their beauty to be preserved and protected at all costs. It would be devastating to have our parks destroyed and disrupted.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless