“Increase administrative costs of patrolling, garbage removal”
“agency already hurting from budget stress”
“Increased costs of road construction and maintenance”
What it names
Works cited
Furniss et al. 1991
The comment
I am in favor of no action option. Opening our remaining roadless areas will:
+ Destroy valuable wildlife habitat
+ Impact protected watersheds
+ Increase uncontrolled public access will lead to more forest fire starts from poorly supervised camping
+ Increase administrative costs of patrolling, garbage removal, etc. from an agency already hurting from budget stress
+ Increased costs of road construction and maintenance.