Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-600858

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “open irreplaceable Montana landscapes up to large-scale logging”
    • “industrialize our national forests”
    • “destroy and murder the regenerative life of nature”
    • “home to all animals we share it with”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “strongly oppose the Proposed Rule rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule”
    • “Please adopt the No Action alternative for the Final Rule”
    • “Rescinding the roadless rule is not a solution”
  • Cultural Heritage Indigenous
    • “clear cutting sacred land”
    • “sacred land”

The comment

Dear Secretary Rollins, I strongly oppose the Proposed Rule rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule. Rolling back the Roadless Rule will open irreplaceable Montana landscapes up to large-scale logging, road construction, and other development that will industrialize our national forests. The Roadless Rule has protected irreplaceable roadless values while permitting fire suppression, fuels mitigation work, trail maintenance, and other forest management activities for the past 25 years. It is a fiscally responsible, environmentally sound, multiple-use management tool. This land is not a resource to exploit, it is our home and home to all animals we share it with. If you think there is anything to accomplish in clear cutting sacred land you are sorely mistaken. How far off from reality do we need to be to destroy and murder the regenerative life of nature, purely for our personal gain. How are you not empathetic enough to see that we are not the only living things on this earth and we all need each other to thrive. I am a teenager, I dont wish to spend my free time in tears writing the government, begging the government to not destroy the world I am being brought into. Im scared and I am tired, and I dont remember a time when I wasnt. Rescinding the roadless rule is not a solution. Have empathy, and take action on a living future. Thank you. Please adopt the No Action alternative for the Final Rule. Sincerely, Phoebe Clarkson Massachusetts

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless