Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-601022

Supports rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “fighting wild fires”
    • “money spent trying to fight wildfires would significantly be reduced”
    • “help prevent wildfires”
    • “Fire fighters would be safer”
  • National Security Public Safety
    • “prepare to evacuate because of close wildfires”
    • “lost their homes due to wildfires”
    • “Animal lives would be spared”
  • Resource Development Extraction
    • “Wood cutters would have more access”
    • “clean up our forests”

The comment

Please remove the roadless rule. We need those roads open for fighting wild fires. The amount of money spent trying to fight wildfires would significantly be reduced if the forest was more easily accessed. Air pollution would be reduced. Animal lives would be spared. Fire fighters would be safer. Wood cutters would have more access which would help clean up our forests and help prevent wildfires. I live in a forested area and have had to prepare to evacuate because of close wildfires. I know people who have lost their homes due to wildfires. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless