I am writing to support Alternative 1: The “No Action” alternative because I believe we should keep the Roadless Rule intact.
I live in Sunnyvale, California and frequently enjoy hiking and backpacking in roadless areas. One of my favorite destinations is the Inyo National Forest, and the thought of roads being built for any reason is appalling. Not only would they despoil the natural beauty, their construction would involve vegetation removal which could lead to the loss of native plants and allow for the colonization of invasive plant species with greatly increased ignition risk of forest fires.
I am not alone in enjoying such places. Roadless areas support outdoor recreation and tourism for all, which contribute billions to the economy.
Please move forward with the No Action Alternative 1, and keep the Roadless Rule intact.