Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-601343

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

Environmental Protection Biodiversity
- “important environmental protection tool”
- “keeps america beautiful”
- “do not support the rollback”
Scientific Research Evidence
- “not scientifically supported”
- “proposed change to the roadless rule”
Public Opinion Support
- “not wanted by constituents”
- “listen to our concerns”

The comment

I do not support the rollback of the roadless rule. It is an important environmental protection tool that keeps america beautiful. This proposed change to the roadless rule is not scientifically supported and it is not wanted by constituents. Please listen to our concerns and do not approve the rule changes.