“mitigating the worsening impacts of climate change”
“climate resilience”
What it names
Roadless areas
Hardesty Mountain
The comment
Dear Secretary Rollins,
I strongly oppose the USDA’s proposal to eliminate or weaken the Roadless Rule. This reckless action would devastate public lands, waste taxpayer resources, and undermine the water, wildlife habitat, and recreation opportunities on which millions of Americans depend.
I personally have camped, fished, boated and rafted in some of the areas currently protected by the Roadless Rule including many times at gorgeous Sparks Lake, Oregon Dunes in the Siuslaw Forest, the PCT near the incomparable Waldo Lake and Hardesty Mountain. To build roads in any of these pristine areas would open them to irreparable damage.
Roadless forests represent some of the most intact, resilient ecosystems left in our country. They filter and store clean drinking water, provide refuge for vulnerable species, and serve as critical carbon sinks critical to mitigating the worsening impacts of climate change. People hike, forage, bike, fish, camp, ski, climb, and find solace in these remote places.
Roads spread invasive species, fragment wildlife habitat, and erode the very ecological resilience we need in the face of a warming climate. More roads in the backcountry also mean more fires: research shows wildfires are more likely to ignite near roads. Once roads and clearcuts fragment these landscapes, the damage is permanent. Weakening or repealing the Roadless Rule would be a grave mistake.
I do not support any of the proposed action alternatives that roll back the Roadless Rule. I urge the USDA to abandon this misguided effort and instead strengthen its commitment to protecting America’s roadless forests for the clean water, climate resilience, recreation, and biodiversity they provide. Leave the Roadless Rule intact to protect these precious resources for future generations.
Sincerely,
Janice Bohman
Eugene, OR 97405-5824
janbohman@comcast.net