Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-601762

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “preservation of these lands is personally important”
    • “destruction of priceless wild lands will become essentially inevitable”
    • “Nature is bigger and more important than any of our material needs”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “value the beauty of our natural landscapes”
    • “ability for us and all future generations to enjoy our natural environments”
    • “lament on what once was but can never return”

What it names

National Forests
San Bernardino National Forest

The comment

I live near the San Bernardino National Forest and have visited other forests throughout other states like Idaho and Arizona. The preservation of these lands is personally important to me, and all should value the beauty of our natural landscapes. If this rule is rescinded the destruction of priceless wild lands will become essentially inevitable. The enrichment of a small percentage of individuals is not worth the ability for us and all future generations to enjoy our natural environments. Think of how older generations today and when you were a child lament on what once was but can never return. That phenomena will be expounded by orders of magnitude if the little preserved land we have left loses that status. Nature is bigger and more important than any of our material needs.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless