Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-601794

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “destroying ecosystems and critical habitat”
    • “wholesale destruction and development of millions of acres of wilderness”
    • “food and shelter and their survival depends upon keeping it intact”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “increased roads and human accessed areas actually INCREASES wildfire risk”
    • “vast majority of wildfires are human caused”
    • “doing anything to heighten that risk is not only poor management”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “last remaining intact wild places”
    • “Roadless places are not unused or empty”
    • “called them home for eons longer than humans have even been around”

What it names

Law cited
36 CFR 29466 FR 3244

The comment

Please DO NOT rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (66 FR 3244) at 36 CFR 294 Subpart B!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is a terrible idea that will lead to wholesale destruction and development of millions of acres of wilderness, destroying ecosystems and critical habitat for plants and animals for whom that landscape is HOME. It's not a negotiable commodity subject to prerogative management, it is their food and shelter and their survival depends upon keeping it intact. Furthermore, research shows that increased roads and human accessed areas actually INCREASES wildfire risk, as the vast majority of wildfires are human caused. As someone who lives in an area increasingly ravaged by catastrophic fires, doing anything to heighten that risk is not only poor management, it's outright reckless and incompetent. I'm so tired of politicians and corportations seeing natural landscapes as something on a commodities balance sheet. Roadless places are not unused or empty, they are being used by the thousands of plants, animals, and insects that have called them home for eons longer than humans have even been around. The idea that we are somehow set apart from nature and do not rely on keeping this places intact is sheer hubris, ignorance, and arrogance. We destroy wild places to not only their peril, but our own. I vehemently oppose rescinding the Roadless Rule, as do the vast majority of Americans. Please do your job and represent OUR voices, not those of corporations who stand to profit from the destruction of some of the last remaining intact wild places we have.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless