Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-602131

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “outsized ecological and recreational value”
    • “render the United States more domesticated”
    • “maintain the Roadless Area Conservation Rule in its current form”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “dramatically decrease my enjoyment of the few wilderness areas”
    • “outsized ecological and recreational value”
    • “wilderness areas I have access to”

What it names

National Forests
White Mountain National Forest
Roadless areas
White Mountain
Law cited
66 FR 3244

The comment

The continental United States is very large, but has very few wilderness areas. Consequently those that do exist, particularly those in the densely populated part of the country that lies to the East of the Mississippi river, have outsized ecological and recreational value. The proposal to rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (66 FR 3244) has the potential to render the United States more domesticated and more European in character. This would dramatically decrease my enjoyment of the few wilderness areas I have access to, including the Pemigewasset wilderness in New Hampshire's White Mountain National Forest. I would encourage the Forest Service to reconsider the proposed rescission of 66 FR 3244 and maintain the Roadless Area Conservation Rule in its current form.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless