Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-603041

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “largest loss of protections for rivers on federal lands”
    • “headwaters of some of the nation's most critical drinking water sources”
    • “helping ensure clean drinking water for more than 25 million Americans”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “protecting fish and wildlife habitat”
    • “safeguard more than 80,000 miles of rivers and streams”
    • “protection for... wildlife across the country”

The comment

Dear Special Areas: Roadless Area Conservation, Dear In response to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's announcement that it is proposing a complete rollback of the 2001 Roadless Rule, I ask you to resist making this change. This is a move that, if finalized, would be the largest loss of protections for rivers on federal lands in U.S. history. Since 2001, the Roadless Rule has protected millions of acres of national forest lands that form the headwaters of some of the nation's most critical drinking water sources. Roadless areas safeguard more than 80,000 miles of rivers and streams, protecting fish and wildlife habitat and helping ensure clean drinking water for more than 25 million Americans, including residents of Denver, Atlanta, and Bozeman. Please reconsider this action, and keep the Roadless Rule as it is: a significant protection for rivers, clean water, and wildlife across the country. Sincerely, Loretta Garcia 4768 N HARRISON AVE, FRESNO, CA 93704-2909 USA FRESNO, CA 93704-2909 loril4garcia@gmail.com Sincerely, Loretta Garcia

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless