Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-603197

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “summer camp community uses the White Mountain National Forest for recreation and camping”
    • “how great this wilderness would be without the Kancamagus Highway and Route 302 dissecting it”
    • “Allowing roads through our wilderness”
  • Climate Carbon Storage
    • “Keeping large forest tracks standing is one of the key ways to counter climate change”
    • “keep our planet healthy”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “Allowing roads through our wilderness and further logging is an immense step backwards”
    • “both environmentally and economically”
    • “do the right thing”

What it names

National Forests
White Mountain National Forest
Roadless areas
White Mountain

The comment

Our summer camp community uses the White Mountain National Forest for recreation and camping. We have often pondered how great this wilderness would be without the Kancamagus Highway and Route 302 dissecting it. Keeping large forest tracks standing is one of the key ways to counter climate change and keep our planet healthy. Allowing roads through our wilderness and further logging is an immense step backwards, both environmentally and economically. Let’s look at the big picture and do the right thing.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless