Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-603303

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “hiked and camped in Superior National Forest”
    • “wild enough to camp in”
    • “trails worth hiking because they're free from noise pollution”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “foundation of a pristine watershed”
    • “Superior National Forest ensures that Lake Superior stays clean”
  • Climate Carbon Storage
    • “Roadless areas are carbon vaults”
    • “keeping our air clean”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “Roadless areas see fewer human-caused wildfires than roaded ones”
    • “Wildfires are 4 times more likely to start near roads”
    • “Roads don't reduce fire risks, it increases it”

What it names

National Forests
Superior National Forest

The comment

My family has hiked and camped in Superior National Forest in MN for over a decade. This rule is the reason this national forest is wild enough to camp in and the trails worth hiking because they're free from noise pollution. Destruction to this national wilderness is not reversible once it's gone. Roadless areas see fewer human-caused wildfires than roaded ones. Wildfires are 4 times more likely to start near roads. Roads don't reduce fire risks, it increases it. Roadless areas are carbon vaults, keeping our air clean. Many of these areas are the foundation of a pristine watershed, and the Superior National Forest ensures that Lake Superior stays clean. Road maintenance is significantly more costly than no roads. Please keep the 2001 Roadless Rule intact.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless