Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-603382

Supports rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Public Land Access Rights
    • “Accessing our public lands is part of the name public”
    • “restriction make the barrier to access the lands”
    • “ways that allow more people greater opportunity to reconnect with the outdoors”

The comment

I support the repeal of the roadless rule. Accessing our public lands is part of the name public. When restriction make the barrier to access the lands that we reserved for ourselves effectively become locked away. I'm not asking for clear cutting, and roads on every slope, but ways that allow more people greater opportunity to reconnect with the outdoors

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless