“open currently protected roadless lands to new development”
The comment
The Forest Service must keep the Roadless Rule intact exactly as it is, utilizing Alternative 1 in the current DEIS. I am very concerned about the proposal to rescind the Roadless Rule.
Roadless areas give us important benefits such as clean drinking water, wildlife habitat, opportunities for outdoor recreation, and protection from the impacts of development. These lands are also an important part of the character and identity of many communities and provide places for people to hike, hunt, fish, camp, ski and otherwise enjoy the outdoors.
I am particularly concerned that rescinding the Roadless Rule could increase development, reduce recreation opportunities, affect wildlife habitat, increase wildfire risk, or harm local economies that depend on outdoor recreation.
The Roadless Rule has provided consistent, nationwide protections for these special places for decades. The Forest Service should not weaken those protections or open currently protected roadless lands to new development. I urge the Forest Service to pursue Alternative 1 and retain the existing Roadless Rule protections.
Sincerely,
Daniel Tatum
3825 NE 115th St Seattle, WA 98125-5757
daniel.b.tatum@gmail.com