Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-604098

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
George Washington National Forest

The comment

I support Alternative 1: keep the Roadless Rule in place. I have lived in the Shenandoah Valley for over twenty years and have spent countless hours fishing for wild brook trout in the mountain streams of George Washington National Forest and mountain biking its many trails. Losing the roadless rules would put much of that in jeopardy. Please leave the roadless rule intact.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless