Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-604151

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “explore this area on a weekly basis”
    • “maintaining it in its current character is extremely important”
    • “rely on wild places”
    • “directly threatens our enjoyment of this lands”
  • Economic Impact Fiscal
    • “licensed outdoor guide”
    • “work and livelihood is directly threatened”
    • “reduction in wild lands”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “Fire prevention is not needed in our region”
    • “overwhelming percentage of fires are caused by people close to roads”
    • “Fewer roads, fewer fires”

What it names

National Forests
White Mountain National Forest
Roadless areas
White Mountain

Attachments

2 files. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

  • Own letter
  • Own letter

The comment

My home is 2.9 miles from White Mountain National Forest, and an Inventoried Roadless Area in the Sandwich Notch area. My wife, my sons (1 and 4), and our extended family explore this area on a weekly basis - sometimes daily. It is extremely special to us, and maintaining it in its current character is extremely important to us. The repeal of the roadless rule is an action without a need - roads cannot be undone (there are still abandoned roads from 200 years old that run all over our forest lands in New Hampshire). Fire prevention is not needed in our region, and nationwide the data seems to indicate that the overwhelming percentage of fires are caused by people close to roads. Fewer roads, fewer fires. Regardless, the places my family and I are building our memories rely on wild places, and repealing the Roadless Rule directly threatens our enjoyment of this lands. Further, as a licensed outdoor guide, my work and livelihood is directly threatened in New Hampshire and nationwide by any reduction in wild lands. I am submitted photos with my 1 year old son close to our home, overlooking one of the IRAs. Please, strengthen the Roadless Rule, rather than eliminating it.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless