Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-604429

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Angeles National Forest
Roadless areas
Arroyo SecoStrawberry Peak

The comment

I have hiked and mountain biked for years in the Angeles National Forest (specifically in the Strawberry Peak and Arroyo Seco roadless areas) and hope to explore other National Forests soon. These protected public lands are our national treasures, and they must be preserved—with exactly the kind of protections the Roadless Rule provides. Rescinding this rule and opening these protected lands to road building and logging would dramatically harm them, irrevocably damaging sensitive ecosystems that in many cases are not protected elsewhere (within the National Park System, for example). The Roadless Rule is a sound, common-sense regulation. It does not prohibit multi-use activities within the areas it protects—it simply ensures damaging roads are not built. We must be good stewards of our public lands and ensure they remain healthy, thriving, and undeveloped for future generations. Please keep the Roadless Rule intact.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless