Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-605523

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

The comment

I believe rolling back the roadless rule is well-intended. However, doing so will have adverse ramifications in the overall health of our western ecosystems, and (unintuitively) potentially threaten public access by encouraging development in once-wild areas. Please consider this perspective when deciding to lend--or not lend--your support. Sincerely, Kieran Balazs 7559 S Lincoln St Midvale, UT 84047-7319 kbalazs@rei.com

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless