Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-606110

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “tourism industry in Pagosa Springs depends upon our keeping our wilderness areas pristine”
    • “devastating to all the outfitters and back country adventurers”
    • “enjoy the largest wilderness area in the lower 48 states”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “putting roads into our dense Ponderosa pine forests increases the chances for forest fires”
    • “we are just coming out of a devastating fire season”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “keeping our wilderness areas pristine”
    • “protected public lands”

What it names

Roadless areas
Ponderosa Pine

The comment

Please do NOT rescind the Roadless Rule on our protected public lands. I live in rural Colorado. Our tourism industry in Pagosa Springs depends upon our keeping our wilderness areas pristine. It will be devastating to all the outfitters and back country adventurers who enjoy the largest wilderness area in the lower 48 states. Also, putting roads into our dense Ponderosa pine forests increases the chances for forest fires, and we are just coming out of a devastating fire season.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless