Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-606374

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “For the sake of wildlife”
    • “maintain this policy”
    • “keep the roadless rule”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “enjoyed wilderness camping”
    • “people who enjoy the outdoors”
    • “impacts nearby public lands”

What it names

Roadless areas
Green Mountain

The comment

Please keep the roadless rule! As a resident of Connecticut I know it impacts nearby public lands like Vermont's Green Mountain National Forest. I recently enjoyed wilderness camping there with my son. For the sake of wildlife and for people who enjoy the outdoors, it is critical that we maintain this policy.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless