Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-606715

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

Roadless areas
Wild River

The comment

I adamantly oppose altering the roadless rule in a way that would increase roads in federal and public lands for multiple reasons. First, ecologically it would devastate sensitive regions throughout the country. It would disrupt ecosystems and endanger species that are already vulnerable. It would increase access to and pollution of wild river systems. Second, it would harm outdoor economies by reducing untouched and remote regions that are a draw for millions of Americans each year. Finally, we need to know that wild, untouched areas still exist and the roadless rule helps provide that, enhancing the lives of all Americans. I strongly urge you to reject this proposal and stand for the present of all of us and the futures of our children.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless