Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-606883

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “preserve as much wilderness as possible”
    • “health of our home planet”
    • “seventh generation approach”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “should stay in effect and not be rescinded”
    • “retain the roadless rule as is”
    • “continue to review and approve only roads as needed”

What it names

Law cited
66 FR 3244

The comment

I believe that the Conservation Rule (2001 Roadless Rule) (66 FR 3244), which prohibits road construction, road reconstruction, and timber harvesting in inventoried roadless areas, with limited exceptions should stay in effect and not be rescinded. We don’t need more roads , we need to take care of the roads we have and preserve as much wilderness as possible for the health of our home planet. We need to continue to review and approve only roads as needed. We don’t need to rescind a rule that works towards a seventh generation approach. I ask that you retain the roadless rule as is.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless