Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-606971

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “enjoy spending time recreating”
    • “massive outdoor recreation industry”
    • “protect our industry and foster growth”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “protection of millions of acres”
    • “in-tact landscapes”
    • “vibrant plant and wildlife populations”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “wildfires remain a top concern”
    • “wildfires are more likely to start in roaded areas”
    • “do not want to see my taxpayer dollars spent on road development”

What it names

Roadless areas
Rocky Mountain

The comment

Please keep the Roadless Rule in place. This rule has led to the protection of millions of acres of national forest where my family and I enjoy spending time recreating. We are grateful for the in-tact landscapes that support vibrant plant and wildlife populations. I am a resident of the Rocky Mountain west where wildfires remain a top concern. Research supports that wildfires are more likely to start in roaded areas compared to roadless. I do not want to see my taxpayer dollars spent on road development and road maintenance. The national forests are a key part of the public lands system which supports a massive outdoor recreation industry. Outdoor recreation is a key part of the economy of the state I live in and I want to support rules like the Roadless Rule to protect our industry and foster growth for my state.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless