I would like to comment on the Roadless Rule on behalf of the San Diego Off Road Coalition (SDORC). SDORC advocates for off road vehicle users in the Southwest of the USA and beyond. We have taken an interest in this action because we have mixed feeling with it. We agree that local forests should have control over their land. We agree that large paved roads and wide graded dirt roads don't belong in certain back country areas, but we would like to drive our recreational vehicles on roads known as two track or single lane trails. We want the rule amended so that if it conhtinues to stand, routes no wider that eight feet be allowed to be constructed in Roadless Areas.
Narrow dirt roads have a minimal effect on species in the forests. Some reptiles prefer areas like dirt roads to soak up the sun.
8-foot-wide trail serves as a vital recreation asset without crossing the threshold into becoming a high-speed, industrial "road"
8-foot trails can act as critical, low-impact access routes for wildland firefighters, search-and-rescue teams, and emergency personnel utilizing smaller tactical vehicles without compromising the overall "roadless" integrity of the area.
Whether the Forest Service completely rescinds the 2001 rule or modifies its frameworks, managing the backcountry requires a balanced approach that embraces the massive economic and cultural value of motorized recreation. I request that the Forest Service direct local forest supervisors to integrate sustainable, 8-foot-wide motorized trail corridors into upcoming Travel Management Rule updates and local forest plans.
Ed Stovin
Director of Land Use SDORC