Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-607585

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

National Forests
Apalachicola National Forest

The comment

As a citizen living in close proximity to the Apalachicola National Forest in Florida, and one appreciative of the environmental blessings derived from it, I am highly concerned about the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule. There is reason to believe that the Roadless Rule has prevented much harm to the Forest ----harm like additional disturbance of the surface water movement, and introduction of non-native plant species to more and more places. I am a citizen and voter who believes that the rescission would be reckless, and I urge rejection of it.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless