Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-609934

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “devastate the forests and animals that make it their home”
    • “untouched nature”
    • “These areas need to remain protected at all costs”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “Camping, hiking, swimming and enjoying the beauty”
    • “enjoy the quiet and peaceful environment”
    • “accessed via a hike or bike ride”
  • Resource Development Extraction
    • “Allowing roads to be built and land to be developed”
    • “Vehicle traffic and land development should not be allowed”

What it names

National Forests
Tahoe National Forest

The comment

My family has owned several mining claims in the Tahoe National Forest for more than 40 years. Camping, hiking, swimming and enjoying the beauty of untouched nature has been our passion and an absolute necessity to maintain my sanity in this world. Allowing roads to be built and land to be developed in these areas will devastate the forests and animals that make it their home. We will no longer be able to enjoy the quiet and peaceful environment that now can only be accessed via a hike or bike ride. Vehicle traffic and land development should not be allowed and the roadless rule should absolutely not be pushed forward. These areas need to remain protected at all costs.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless