Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-610191

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

Roadless areas
Bunker Hill

The comment

Dear Secretary Rollins, I strongly oppose the USDA’s proposal to eliminate or weaken the Roadless Rule. This reckless action would devastate public lands, waste taxpayer resources, and undermine the water, wildlife habitat, and recreation opportunities on which millions of Americans depend. For over 40 years since the second battle of Bunker Hill, when we tried to save old growth trees in Lane County, Oregon, we have known the value of old growth forests to humans and the wildlife that inhabit these forests. Cut the second growth trees, and please leave these old growth forests road less for all the benefits they provide for all living beings. Thank you, Sincerely, Diane Albino Springfield, OR 97477-1886 iriedi@yahoo.com

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless