Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-611444

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “avid user of our National Forests”
    • “registered Trail Steward in Coconino County”
    • “Arizona Trail is a National Scenic Trail”
    • “provide recreation opportunities”
  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “wildlife habitat”
    • “undeveloped public lands are among our nations most valuable natural resources”
    • “Once we develop these spaces, we can never get them back”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “protect our watersheds”
    • “Roadless areas provide... protect our watersheds”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “most valuable natural resources”
    • “managed for long-term public interest”
    • “hurt every generation to come”

What it names

National Forests
Coronado National Forest

The comment

I oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule and urge the U.S. Department of Agriculture to adopt the “No Action” alternative. I am an avid user of our National Forests and a registered Trail Steward in Coconino County, Arizona of the Arizona Trail. The Arizona Trail is a National Scenic Trail that runs the length of the state of Arizona. Our undeveloped public lands are among our nations most valuable natural resources. The Roadless areas provide recreation opportunities, wildlife habitat and protect our watersheds. Once we develop these spaces, we can never get them back. The Arizona Trail specifically crosses areas throughout the state that would be affected by any change the Roadless rules. Area's of the Coronado National Forest near Tucson would be directly impacted and damaged. Our national lands should be managed for long-term public interest instead of short-term business opportunities. Fully or partially rescinding the Road Rule under Alternative 2 and 3 would be a mistake that will hurt every generation to come. I oppose the proposal to rescind or alter the Roadless Rule and support Alternative 1, the No Action Alternative.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless