Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-612101

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Governance Policy Process
    • “oppose the proposed rescission”
    • “ask the Department to select Alternative 1 (No Action)”
    • “rests on an incomplete record”
  • Economic Impact Fiscal
    • “carries real costs for taxpayers”
    • “local economies”
    • “small, uncertain gains”

Attachments

1 file from Earth Day Network. Counts as 2,273 — Counted from the files: The enclosed submissions were counted from the files themselves.

  • Enclosed submissions

The comment

This comment is submitted on behalf of Earth Day Network, inc. (d.b.a. EARTHDAY.ORG) and 2294 individuals who signed the attached letter. We, the undersigned, oppose the proposed rescission of the 2001 Roadless Rule, and ask the Department to select Alternative 1 (No Action). By the Department's own numbers, rescission offers small, uncertain gains, carries real costs for taxpayers and local economies, and rests on an incomplete record. See attached file for the full public comment.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless