Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-612135

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “protects our wild and wildnerness spaces”
    • “increase the spreaad of invasive plant species”
    • “over 100 species of plant and animals are at risk of decline”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “impact our drinking water”
    • “movement and contamination of sediments in water sources”
    • “Roadless areas and clean water”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “reduces risk of wildfires”
    • “more roads to NOT lead to better forest health”
    • “wildfires ignition rates in roadless areas is considerably lower”
  • Scientific Research Evidence
    • “A study conducted by the forest service based on 20 years of data”
    • “Another study that analyzed 32 years of data”
    • “A 2019 study indicated that in Utah alone”

What it names

Works cited
10.1088/1748-932610.1186/s42408-026-00450-210.2489/jswc.66.3.78aDellaSala et al. 2011Healey 2020

The comment

I would like to oppose rescinding the federal 2001 roadless rule. This rule prohibts road construction and logging on nearly 60 million acres of Forest Service land. This rule protects our wild and wildnerness spaces, reduces risk of wildfires, and helps to support our ecosystem overall. A study conducted by the forest service based on 20 years of data itself concluded that more roads to NOT lead to better forest health and, in fact, increase the spreaad of invasive plant species and do not increase fire-management activity (Healey, 2020). Another study that analyzed 32 years of data (Aplet, Hartger, & Dietz, 2026) demonstrated that wildfires ignition rates in roadless areas is considerably lower than areas closer to roads. A 2019 study indicated that in Utah alone over 100 species of plant and animals are at risk of decline without the protections of the roadless rule (McClure, & Dickson, 2019). Additional research has indicated that rescinding the roadless rule will impact our drinking water as roads play a major role in movement and contamination of sediments in water sources (DellaSala, 2011; DaSala, Karr, & Olson, 2011). There are no long-term benefits of rescinding this rule. Any perceived benefits are short-lived and short-sighted. Citations: Aplet, G.H., Hartger, P. & Dietz, M.S. Three-decade record of contiguous-U.S. national forest wildfires indicates increased density of ignitions near roads. fire ecol 22, 8 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-026-00450-2 DellaSala, 2011. Roadless ares and clean water. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 66(3): 78A-84A DOI:10.2489/jswc.66.3.78A DellaSala, D. A., Karr, J. R., & Olson, D. M. (2011). Roadless areas and clean water. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 66(3), 78A-84A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.3.78A Healey, 2020. Long-term forest health implications of roadlessness, 15, 1748-9326, DOI:10.1088/1748-9326, 10, Environmental Research Letters, IOP Publishing McClure, & Dickson, 2019. Predicted impacts of Utah's roadless areas proposal: Biodiversity loss, habitat fragmentation, and ecosysten degradation. Conservation Science Partners.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless