Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-612345

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “Rains in the mountains fuel the reservoirs”
    • “drinking water of the Eastern US”
    • “protects the forest that we rely on”
  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “ecological diversity that we retained”
    • “Protecting these lands from commercial exploitation”
    • “allow these lands to continue to recover”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “artist in awe of the thousands of acres of forest”
    • “shared resource we want preserved”
    • “saves them for all of us”

What it names

Roadless areas
Black Mountain

The comment

This past weekend, I met a man from England visiting Black Mountain, NC. He was an artist in awe of the thousands of acres of forest. I oppose removal of the “Roadless Rule” because it is what protects the forest that we rely on. Rains in the mountains fuel the reservoirs, rivers, drinking water of the Eastern US. The ecological diversity that we retained after the initial logging is still a wonder and resource. Protecting these lands from commercial exploitation, saves them for all of us. Keep the roadless rule, allow these lands to continue to recover. These are a shared resource we want preserved for the future.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless