Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-612355

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “protection of old-growth and mature forests”
    • “home to more than 77 bird species of conservation concern”
    • “essential for healthy bird populations”
  • Climate Carbon Storage
    • “extensive carbon stores”
    • “ecological value for birds”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “ensuring that downstream communities have safe drinking water”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “contribute to local and rural economies through recreation, birdwatching, hunting, and fishing”
    • “recreational value for current and future generations”

What it names

National Forests
Tongass National Forest

Attachments

1 file from National Audubon Society. Counts as 73,775 — Counted from the files: The enclosed submissions were counted from the files themselves.

  • Enclosed submissions

The comment

Please find attached an Excel spreadsheet (.xlsx) containing the names of 74,726 supporters of the National Audubon Society who signed onto the letter below asking the Forest Service not to repeal the Roadless Rule. ===================================  We stand with the National Audubon Society to urge the U.S. Forest Service not to repeal the Roadless Rule. The Forest Service is responsible for managing our nation's forests to sustain their health, ecological diversity, and productivity, which includes the protection of old-growth and mature forests. Special places like the Tongass National Forest should be protected because of their ecological value for birds, their extensive carbon stores, and their subsistence, heritage, and recreational value for current and future generations. Roadless areas represent some of the most intact public lands and wildlife habitats left in the country, home to more than 77 bird species of conservation concern. These lands contribute to local and rural economies through recreation, birdwatching, hunting, and fishing, while also ensuring that downstream communities have safe drinking water. Ecological forest management to mitigate fire risk, ensure community safety, and improve habitat is important. The Forest Service should focus on how roadless areas are managed and maintained to improve habitats and reduce fire risk, rather than narrowly focusing on road-building and large-scale timber harvests in remote and ecologically sensitive areas. The intact forests of the National Forest System are essential for healthy bird populations, and these public lands are part of what makes our country so special. The Forest Service should not repeal the long-standing protections for forests in the Roadless Rule. ===================================  If you have any questions about the names, prefer to receive them in a different format, or need additional information about the individuals signing the letter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Please accept our thanks for ensuring that the input of these concerned individuals is considered. 

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless