Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-612594

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

The comment

Thanks to all who tirelessly serve the taxpayer base via their work in the federal government. I vehemently stand against rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule. The rule is in place today to conserve and save the few remaining wild places left in the USA. Rescinding the rule will undoubtedly cause undo harm to the backcountry as we know it, even if its not intended too. Leave wild places wild! Thank You Jon De Jong 720 Boston Ave NE Orange City, IA 51041

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless