Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-612677

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Wildlife Habitat
    • “enjoyed the wildlife”
    • “negatively impact our quality of wildlife”
    • “impact rescinding could have on our wildlife”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “takes walks though the luscious trees”
    • “without worry of traffic imposing our path”
    • “walking paths”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “negatively impact our quality of ... water”
    • “fresh air”

What it names

National Forests
Jefferson National Forest

The comment

I oppose the proposal to fully or partially rescind the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. We live within walking distance to the George Washington and Jefferson National Forest and have thoroughly enjoyed the wildlife and fresh air it has to offer. Our family takes walks though the luscious trees without worry of traffic imposing our path and fresh air. I believe rescinding the roadless area conservation rule will negatively impact our quality of wildlife, water, walking paths, and sounds of nature that we experience every time we step into the forest. Please take a moment and consider the impact rescinding could have on our wildlife and conservation of the protected nature resource that we have. Thank you

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless