Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-613016

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “devastate public lands”
    • “fragment wildlife habitat”
    • “intact, resilient ecosystems”
    • “biodiversity they provide”
  • Water Quality Quantity
    • “filter and store clean drinking water”
    • “clean water”
    • “undermine the water”
  • Climate Carbon Storage
    • “critical carbon sinks”
    • “mitigating the worsening impacts of climate change”
    • “climate resilience”
  • Recreation Tourism Public Use
    • “recreation opportunities”
    • “People hike, forage, bike, fish, camp, ski, climb”
    • “find solace in these remote places”

What it names

Works cited
10.1016/j.biocon.2026.11195010.1186/s42408-026-00450-2

The comment

Dear Secretary Rollins, I strongly oppose the USDA’s proposal to eliminate or weaken the Roadless Rule. This reckless action would devastate public lands, waste taxpayer resources, and undermine the water, wildlife habitat, and recreation opportunities on which millions of Americans depend. Roadless forests represent some of the most intact, resilient ecosystems left in our country. They filter and store clean drinking water, provide refuge for vulnerable species, and serve as critical carbon sinks critical to mitigating the worsening impacts of climate change. People hike, forage, bike, fish, camp, ski, climb, and find solace in these remote places. Roads spread invasive species, fragment wildlife habitat, and erode the very ecological resilience we need in the face of a warming climate. More roads in the backcountry also mean more fires: research shows wildfires are more likely to ignite near roads. Once roads and clearcuts fragment these landscapes, the damage is permanent. Weakening or repealing the Roadless Rule would be a grave mistake. I do not support any of the proposed action alternatives that roll back the Roadless Rule. I urge the USDA to abandon this misguided effort and instead strengthen its commitment to protecting America’s roadless forests for the clean water, climate resilience, recreation, and biodiversity they provide. Leave the Roadless Rule in place. Some of the places I hold most dear in Oregon are USFS Roadless Areas. They are forests in which I’ve seen pine martens and long-tailed weasels, places that support far-ranging elk and wolves near Willamette Pass. We have obliterated so many of the planet’s ecosystems. Here we have an opportunity to keep ecosystems and their functions for wildlife and climate change intact. References: Aplet, G.H., Hartger, P. & Dietz, M.S. Three-decade record of contiguous-U.S. national forest wildfires indicates increased density of ignitions near roads. fire ecol 22, 8 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-026-00450-2 Mildrexler, D.J., Berner, L.T., Law, B.E. & Both, M.S. Roadless rule rescission threatens highest integrity forest ecosystems in the United States. Biological Conservation 321, 111950 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2026.111950 Sincerely, Julie Polhemus Eugene, OR 97405-3051 juliepolhemus@gmail.com

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless