I am writing to submit a public comment on the Notice of Intent to rescind the 2001 Roadless Rule. I care deeply about our national forests and the ecosystems they create. As someone who has vacationed every year in the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest in Wisconsin, I am deeply aware of how special it is that places like this are protected. I strongly oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule due to the impact it could have on areas like this, reducing habitat for wildlife and creating environmental harm.
I worry about the impact repealing the 2001 Roadless Rule could have on these mature forest ecosystems and water quality. In terms of the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, has noted that the repealing of it may increase sediment pollution harming important spawning areas for fish populations, increasing water temperatures and threatening wild rice beds. In a world where forests are ever shrinking, protecting these mature woodlands is an important part of combatting climate change and creating wildlife sanctuary. Research has shown that these areas protected by the Roadless Rules serve as important areas for conservation - sustaining biodiversity, protecting important watersheds, and keeping habitat for wildlife.
For all these reasons — I strongly oppose rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule and would ask that the Forest Service choose the "No Action Alternative".
Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment, for standing up for our forests, and for your passion to protect our public lands.