Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-613831

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

  • Environmental Protection Biodiversity
    • “too much habitat loss in Florida already”
    • “Ocala National Forest should be left undisturbed”
    • “respect for the environment restored”
  • Forest Management Wildfire
    • “rescinding the roadless rule will increase the risk posed by wildfires”
    • “not mitigate it”
  • Governance Policy Process
    • “Destroying trust in government”
    • “ill-advised proposed rule change”
    • “Rescind this proposed rule immediately”

What it names

National Forests
Ocala National Forest

The comment

There is too much habitat loss in Florida already. The Ocala National Forest should be left undisturbed. Evidence suggests that rescinding the roadless rule will increase the risk posed by wildfires, not mitigate it. This rule needs to be rescinded and respect for the environment restored. It is unbelievably greedy and asinine to rescind the roadless rule. Destroying trust in government one ill-advised proposed rule change at a time. It will take an entire generation, if not three generations to recover from the harm of the past two years alone. Rescind this proposed rule immediately.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless